For reishi, the strongest recent synthesis is a 2025 GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials, which examined nutritional and metabolic outcomes and graded the certainty of each — the honest approach, and rarer than it should be[1]. A separate 2024 meta-analysis of metabolic endpoints in humans reached broadly compatible conclusions[2].
For lion's mane, a 2025 systematic review in Frontiers in Nutrition gathered the benefit and side-effect data together and found the cognition and mood signals promising but underpowered[4]. A broader 2024 review in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews covered mushrooms and neurocognitive health across the lifespan and reached the same verdict: plausible, patchy, worth testing properly[5]. A registered randomised trial on lion's mane and cognition is recruiting now[7].
For cordyceps, the human literature is thinner than the internet suggests. Cordycepin's pharmacology as an adenosine analogue is well characterised; the translation into durable human outcomes is not[8]. We use it in infusion because of what it does in the gut, not because of a claim we cannot support.